Difference between revisions of "Collaboration for transformation (booklet)"
From EcoliseWiki
Tom Henfrey (talk | contribs) m (→Contents) |
Tom Henfrey (talk | contribs) (created link to communities in action page) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
;Page 4. [[Growing the knowledge base]] | ;Page 4. [[Growing the knowledge base]] | ||
:An overview of the Status report, including the process, the ECOLISE wiki, open online meeting series etc, research as learning, we all have to learn together - try to break the paradigm of one direction (student, prof) [ possibly at the end] | :An overview of the Status report, including the process, the ECOLISE wiki, open online meeting series etc, research as learning, we all have to learn together - try to break the paradigm of one direction (student, prof) [ possibly at the end] | ||
− | ;Pages 5-11. Communities in | + | ;Pages 5-11. [[Communities in action]]: |
:[Each these sections key information (benefits, barriers, potential) - could be summaries highlighted in a box or similar.], Likewise, for each of these 'XX Communities' sections I would suggest we try to include as much factual information as possible (scale, impacts,etc..): | :[Each these sections key information (benefits, barriers, potential) - could be summaries highlighted in a box or similar.], Likewise, for each of these 'XX Communities' sections I would suggest we try to include as much factual information as possible (scale, impacts,etc..): | ||
:c200 words core text, 1 or 2 sentences for each of benefits, barriers, potential | :c200 words core text, 1 or 2 sentences for each of benefits, barriers, potential |
Revision as of 13:18, 4 June 2018
Collaboration for transformation is a booklet being produced to mark the second European Day of Sustainable Communities on September 22nd 2018.
Its format will be 16 B5 pages, including pictures and graphics, making the maximum word count 350 words per page.
Contents
- Page 1. Front Cover
- (need to agree full title)
- Collaboration for transformation: (need to include sustainability, low carbon, Municipalities, etc…???)
- (Community sustainability action to a regenerated Europe/World)
- Page 2. Table of Contents
- Page 3. Overview
- Frame within our asks and include a summary of recommendations (contextualise the recommendations); CLIs and networks all over Europe - ECOLISE and wider (1 par overview); meta-analysis
- Page 4. Growing the knowledge base
- An overview of the Status report, including the process, the ECOLISE wiki, open online meeting series etc, research as learning, we all have to learn together - try to break the paradigm of one direction (student, prof) [ possibly at the end]
- Pages 5-11. Communities in action
- [Each these sections key information (benefits, barriers, potential) - could be summaries highlighted in a box or similar.], Likewise, for each of these 'XX Communities' sections I would suggest we try to include as much factual information as possible (scale, impacts,etc..):
- c200 words core text, 1 or 2 sentences for each of benefits, barriers, potential
- ensure continuity of narrative that shows these are different lenses (with an incremental relationship - successively becoming more systemic)
- Page 5. Growing communities
- different types of food-based community initiatives,
- Page 6. Energy communities
- community energy projects and similar
- Page 7. Enterprising communities
- solidarity economy, co-ops, community currencies, Reconomy, permaculture/regenerative enterprise, ecovillage enterprise
- Pages 8-9. Centre spread
- Map of Europe with 7 highlighted CLIs
- Page 10. Democratic communities
- degrowth critique of democratic deficit - questioning the growth question
- commons-based forms of ownership and organisation
- decision- making processes
- Page 11. Regenerative communities
- overcoming disempowerment, healing social divisions, … (something positive to finish) Need to check we have the right source material
- Page 12-13. Collaborations;
- including MiT, Sustainable Communities Programme and action at other levels (national and EU)
- democratic alternatives (e.g. Marinaleda, Froome, Napoli (Armiero & di Angelis)
- Pages 14-15. Recommendations (for policy and for practice, research?)
- co-creative process, join our wiki and Status report; 2021-2027 pathway where people could envision the links of our pathways (could be part of P.4)
- SDG implementation needs to give more response to Communities;
- Climate change - comm offer alternative trajectories for Paris not just implementation but whole articulation and framing of the issues to become much more realistic
- Page 16. Back cover