Ecocities

From EcoliseWiki
Revision as of 14:34, 11 February 2020 by Duncan Crowley (talk | contribs) (Created page with "'''Ecocities''' were initially “a collection of ideas and propositions about sustainable urban planning, transportation, housing, public participation and social justice, wi...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Ecocities were initially “a collection of ideas and propositions about sustainable urban planning, transportation, housing, public participation and social justice, with practical examples relatively few and far between”[1]. International Ecocity Conferences have happened since 1990 and are now organised, mostly, biannually by Ecocity Builders. Many other ecocity initiatives also exist. Since the mid 2000s ecocity projects became increasingly global and mainstream, as responses to climate change and rapid urbanisation, especially in China.

Origins of Ecocities

Efforts to render cities environmentally and socially sustainable are not new, according to Joss[2], but the term “eco-city” became popular in the 1970’s[3] and was first noted academically by Richard Register’s[4] 1987 book, Ecocity Berkeley: Building Cities for a Healthy Future[5]. This was followed by the first International Ecocity Conference in 1990 at Berkeley[6]. During the 1980s and early 1990s, the ecocity concept remained largely open to interpretation both in terms of definition and focus[7], with the ‘ecocity’ concept remaining “a collection of ideas and propositions about sustainable urban planning, transportation, housing, public participation and social justice, with practical examples relatively few and far between”. Joss’s 2009 study mapped this early wave of ecocity and sustainable urbanism examples, it analysed and compared some 79 identified ecocity initiatives and identified three broad ecocity categories that encompass most current ecocity developments:

  1. new-build ecocities
  2. the retro-fitting of existing urban environments
  3. the expansion of existing urban areas

Development of ecocities from 2000 onward

In the mid 2000s things quickly changed in terms of the "ecocity" concept, as Joss outlines:

The phenomenon appears to have become increasingly global and mainstream, against the background of the international recognition of the scale and severity of climate change and rapid urbanisation, particularly in the developing world… with countries and cities competing to take a lead in developing and applying new socio-technological innovations and thus bringing about the next generation of sustainable towns and cities.

The two grandest Ecocity projects that were boldly announced as heralding a new age for urbanism were Dongtan in China (announced 2003, launched 2005) and Masdar City in Abu Dhabi, (launched 2006). Sze[8] notes how these projects were motivated by financial and political gain and supported by elite power structures in the UK, China and Abu Dhabi. Both projects had British design groups: Arup for Dongton, Norman Foster for Masdar City. Cugurullo[9] arques that both turned out to be spectacular failures. Caprotti has made similar criticisms of the the latest Chinese ecocity, Tianjin.

Dongtan, China
China announced in 2001 that its goal was to build 400 new cities of 1 million inhabitants each by 2020, or 20 new cities a year for 20 years[10] with Dongtan being the flagship, Sze notes Arup’s description: “Dongtan represents the quest to create a new world”. It was planned on an ecologically sensitive wetlands island near Shanghai, to open in 2010 with accommodation for 10,000, and be onethird the size of Manhattan by 2050 with a population of half a million. The project ran into difficulties and no construction has taken place yet(get update). Sze later added: “The desires that Dongtan represents are those of green or sustainable capitalist discourse, which suggests that capitalist means are the best solution to environmental problems”.
Masdar City, Abu Dhabi
In 2006, the government of Abu Dhabi, the largest and most oil rich of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), announced that it intended to spend $22 billion to build a new eco-city to house 40,000 residents, which would rely entirely on solar energy and other renewable energy sources. To date, very little has been built and much is on hold. Cugurullo (2013) argues that Sustainability is not the real aim of Masdar and that the image of the ideal sustainable city was used to boost the local economy and fulfil the political interests of the ruling class. He labelled the project, and others like it: Frankenstein cities (2016), an example of “(de)composed urbanism”, a metaphor for experiments generated by forced union of different, decaying parts, to form “a “patchwork” of different pieces of urban fabric produced by different clean-tech projects” (CUGURULLO, 2016, chapter 14).
Tianjin ecocity, China
Turning to the latest flagship project of Chinese eco-urbanism; Tianjin ecocity, outside China’s fourth largest city Tianjin, Caprotti (2015) asks the critical question: ‘Eco’ for whom?, exploring “whether Tianjin eco-city will become, like Masdar, a non-place (Cugurullo, 2013) characterized by grand corporate urban planning and environmental-economic visions, but devoid of an organic society- a city stillborn” (CAPROTTI, 2015, p.19). His findings point to the creation of modern apartments as bubbles or containers for eco living, disconnected from the public realm and void of a sustainable, socially resilient community in the eco-city, with much of the process of construction based on the marketing of a lifestyle (few can afford) as much as a programme that seeks to positively affect the environment. The projects levels of artificialness went as far as fake leaves being tied onto a whole avenue of bare trees, which “seemed to point metaphorically to the strained marketing of a ‘harmonious’ and ‘ecologically friendly’ city as an artificial and ultimately misleading foil for yet another new-build luxury residential project” (CAPROTTI, 2015, p.16).

Cugurullo (2013), Sze (2015) and Caprotti (2015) all question what type of life and citizen is being welcomed, or invited, to these new ecocities and argue that 39 the developments are not affordable. Johnson[11] [12] is also critical of this recent wave of ecocity development, calling it Cyburbia (Cyborg and Suburbia), exclusive and smart, but ultimately a non-resilient city:

If you look at these “ecocities”, a lot of them have been set up as this gilded speedboat city, that a few rich people jump into to escape the sinking titanic of the megacity. As the big city goes down, rather than trying to solve its problems, they get into this gated community, a gilded city for a few.

Ecocity Builders International Conferences

In 1992 Register founded the non-profit group Ecocity Builders, for whom the Ecocity was an “ecologically healthy city”, they run a biannual Global conference. In 2010 they launched the International Ecocity Framework and Standards (IEFS), which works with an international committee of expert advisors. Together in 2010, in Vancouver Canada, IEFS adopted the following description for an Ecocity:

An Ecocity is a human settlement modelled on the self sustaining resilient structure and function of natural ecosystems. The ecocity provides healthy abundance to its inhabitants without consuming more (renewable) resources than it produces, without producing more waste than it can assimilate, and without being toxic to itself or neighbouring ecosystems. Its inhabitants’ ecological impact reflect planetary supportive lifestyles; its social order reflects fundamental principles of fairness, justice and reasonable equity. While the Ecocity concept has gone through different stages, the recent ones in China and UAE of mega top down exclusive projects, have not been successful. Ecocity projects that engage with all cities and communities, and not just the privileged exclusive few, seem more aligned to the hopes of SDGs, NUA and Sustainable Cities. A logical step would be the scaling up of best practice from the ecovillage world, specifically the main group Global Ecovillage Network (GEN). We will now look at where their ideas have come from, where they are attempting to get to, and how, with all peoples of the planet.

References

  1. JOSS, Simon. Eco-cities: a global survey 2009. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment 129 (May), 239–50. 2009. Accessed Feb 11th 2020. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271423351_Eco-cities_A_global_survey_2009
  2. JOSS, Simon. Eco-cities: a global survey 2009. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment 129 (May), 239–50. 2009. Accessed Feb 11th 2020. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271423351_Eco-cities_A_global_survey_2009
  3. ROSELAND, Mark. Dimensions of the eco-city. Published in: Cities, vol 14, No. 4, pp: 197–202. UK, 1997. Accessed Feb 11th 2020. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222495799_Dimensions_of_the_eco-city
  4. Richard Register on Ecocity Builders https://ecocitybuilders.org/richard-register/
  5. REGISTER, Richard. Ecocity Berkeley: Building Cities for a Healthy Future. North Atlantic Books. Berkeley, California, US. 1987 https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/136574.Ecocity_Berkeley
  6. Ecocity Builders history; The first International Ecocity Conference in Berkeley in 1990 https://ecocitybuilders.org/history/
  7. CAPROTTI, Federico. Eco-urbanism and the Eco-city, or, Denying the Right to the City? In, Antipode, Vol. 46 No. 5 2014. https://www.academia.edu/6264140/Caprotti_F_2014_Eco-urbanism_and_the_Ecocity_or_Denying_the_Right_to_the_City
  8. SZE, Julie & ZHOU, Yi. Imagining a Chinese Eco-City. Published in “Environmental Criticism for the Twenty-First Century”, Routledge, New York. 2011. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9780203814918/chapters/10.4324/9780203814918-22
  9. CUGURULLO Federico (2013). The Business of Utopia: Estidama and the road to the Sustainable City, Utopian Studies Vol. 24, No. 1, 66-88. http://www.academia.edu/5428732/The_Business_of_Utopia_Estidama_and_the_Road_to_the_Sustainable_City_-_Utopian_Studies
  10. MARS, Neville & HORNSBY Adrian. The Chinese Dream: A Society Under Construction. 010 Publishers. 2008. https://www.amazon.com/Chinese-Dream-Society-Under-Construction/dp/9064506523
  11. JOHNSON, Leo & Blowfield, Michael. Turnaround Challenge. Business and the City of the Future. Oxford University Press. UK. November 2013. https://www.amazon.com/Turnaround-Challenge-Business-City-Future/dp/0199672210
  12. JOHNSON, Leo. Eco-Cities. Speaking on BBC; Costing the Earth. Apr 2015. http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b05r3w3n