Difference between revisions of "EcoliseWiki:Status Report 2021 content"
(→Being Spaces for/of...)
(→Sustainability in Practice: added topics from elsewhere in original draft)
|Line 43:||Line 43:|
** Structural coupling
** Structural coupling
* Epistemic plurality
* Epistemic plurality
** Ecology of mind
** Ecology of mind
Revision as of 17:45, 26 March 2020
Core Content Structure
Being Spaces for/of...
- Economic Diversity
- It is increasingly evident that current economic paradigms - particularly the capitalist premise of perpetual growth in GDP - are fundamentally incompatible with sustainability, including fulfillment of the Paris Agreement, Sustainable Development Goals and Green New Deal. However, diverse and abundant alternative ideas and models now exist, which abandon theoretical dogma in favour of the practical question of how to live together in shared prosperity on an ecologically finite planet.
- Mainstream political consensus (and its contradictions with capitalism)
- Paris Climate Agreement
- Green New Deal
- Alternative Economics
- Distinction of economic form vs. substance (Polanyi)
- Political economy models
- Wellbeing economy/economy for common good
- Nature Stewardship
- Democratic Political Practice/Inclusive Governance
- Environmentally and socially destructive economic systems are inherently connected with centralised and inequitable political systems capable of co-option by those who already hold wealth and power. Moving towards sustainability and social justice requires more inclusive and democratic forms of decision-making and allocation of rights over shared resources. Approaches to inclusive governance already in use by many communities of place and/or practice provide potential models for a wider democratisation of society.
- Living Values
- Incumbent economic and political systems implicitly embed values at odds with sustainability and social justice, and hence build these in operationally as both operational features and inevitable outcomes. Community initiatives seeking to create and enact alternative economic and governnance paradigms operate according to very different sets of values. Making these values explicit enables critical self-reflection (and formal evaluation) on whether and to what extent they are, or are not, being upheld, and at the same time highlights contrasts with dominant systems.
- Regenerative Cultures
- Values of sustainability, justice and care, in the context of accelerating social and ecological degeneration, oblige us to move from exploitation to regeneration as the cultural premise for human societies. Regenerative cultures take many different forms, rooted in place and responsive to local and regional environmental, ecological, economic, social, and cultural conditions. They represent diverse possible responses to current crises, and indicate potential trajectories towards human presence on earth becoming something that safeguards and enriches the biosphere.
- Translocal Networks
- Locally rooted action that remains local in perspective and scope is limited in its potential, in itself, to contribute to wider transformation. Collaboration among those working towards regenerative cultures in different places allows them to become more than the some of their parts. Through networking, mutual inspiration, shared learning, diffusion of ideas and practices, and strategic action at national and international levels, local and regional initiatives connect, spread and grow into broad-based movements for change.
- Territorial/Bioregional Partnerships
- The specific thematic focus of any translocal network is never by itself adequate to navigate the complexity of local realities. When multiple networks and converge upon a single physical locality, broad partnerships of actors working at local-to-regional scale can emerge, each bringing its own set of perspectives and competencies. Their combination in multi-stakeholder partnerships working towards agreed broad goals creates the greatest potential for both rapid local transition and catalysing wider societal transformation.
- Social Solidarity Economy
- An economy based on principles of competition and self-interest puts provision of basic needs at odds with regeneration of social and ecological value. Collective, democratically organised action through inclusive place-based partnerships, connected via translocal networks, can be the basis for reshaping economic life at all levels on the basis of solidarity, cooperation and care for people and other living systems.
Sustainability in Practice
- Working with Nature
- Conceptual and material separation from nature is a key root cause of current crises. Recognising that human economies are living systems, embedded within and dependent upon biological processes, is key to their sustainability. Understanding the principles that allow ecological systems to combine productivity and resilience can also inform the intentional design of human systems.
- Nature-based solutions
- Dynamic Sustainabilities
- Social-ecological resilience
- Structural coupling
- Rights of nature
- Planetary consciousness
- Epistemic plurality
- Ecology of mind
- Biocultural diversity
- Transition Design
- Environmental and socially destructive impact are not incidental contingent side-effects of capitalism, but inherent, if unintended, consequences of its need to extract surplus value. Recognising this raises the converse prospect of deliberate design of socio-economic systems for sustainable and equitable outcomes, through inclusive and democractic processes and as unique expressions of local biocultural conditions, and in mutually beneficial interrelationships with other localities.
- Autonomous design
- Indigenous knowledge
- Post colonialism
- Transition movement
- Commons Ecologies
- Basing production on private property disincentivises social responsibility, while centralised state control undermines individual and community autonomy. Commons, in which users self-organise for the stewardship and allocation of shared resources on the basis of need and capability, are the basis of all known cases of human societies living within local ecological limits. Commons ecologies existing in mutually generative relationships with each other are an outcome of Transition design that provide a potential model for global sustainable society, rooted in diverse local specifics
- Social Innovation
- The modes of thought and action accessible through dominant regimes can only ultimately reinforce the material and subjective structures of oppression that are the root causes of inequality, injustice and ecological degradation. Niche actors able collectively to understand, organise themselves and act upon the world are capable of innovative forms of action that challenge dominant logics and provide alternatives to them. Their transformative potential is particularly evident in the face of game-changers: radical shifts in conditions that bring into question the viability and desirability of current systems, demonstrating both the possibility for and necessity of radical change.
- Grassroots innovations
- Transformative social innovation
- Growing Edges
- Community-led initiatives have not, on any large scale, halted or reversed environmental and social damage or the economic and political systems that rely on them. In some cases and respects, by decontextualising normalised and accepted behaviours and conventions with socially and/or environmentally perverse outcomes, they make them more visible, indicating where more work is needed (including within community initiatives themselves) to become consistent with expressed values. Barriers and constraints experienced by community initiatives working towards environmental and social outcomes supported by broad social and/or political consensus but impossible to achieve in practice, reveal the contradictions and points of intransigence in dominant systems.
- Facing the shadow
- Inner transition and personal development
- Working with conflict
- Problems commonly faced by and within CLIs
- Barriers and constraints to effective action